3 ms·
> you can't acquire a standalone copy of most of their content That was the default for decades in film. Film schools had personal libraries students would sc
by pfranz 8y ago
> you can't acquire a standalone copy of most of their content
That was the default for decades in film. Film schools had personal libraries students would schedule time to use. Home video changed that (which was fought against by the industry) and the original DVD Netflix changed that again for rare movies. I can see how that would affect your emotions but it has had little/no effect with the Academy Awards.
I actually think Spielberg would be ok with not allowing Apple, either. Years ago, when iTunes and iPod video started getting films, Spielberg said something like, "I didn't create these movies to be viewed on a tiny screen."
I haven't followed this too closely, but I get where Spielberg is coming from--although, I dunno if I agree with him that Emmys are better suited for Netflix (they have their own agenda). The Academy was built for the betterment of theatrical feature film. The whole point of the Academy Awards is to promote feature film. If Netflix is just doing the minimum to gain credibility for something that's not feature films, I can see why the Academy is not cool with that.
- SilasX 8y agoKind of hard to make sense of his position: >I actually think Spielberg would be ok with not allowing Apple, either. Years ago, when iTunes and iPod video started getting films, Spielberg said something like, "I didn't create these movies to be viewed on a tiny screen." So, in future movies he required a rider on the studio contract that they'd never be released on mobile phone or tablet platforms? He restricted himself to indie movies where he could ensure this artistic purity now that he has unlimited wealth to rest on?
- Wowfunhappy 8y agoSee kahirsch's comment below—Spielberg believes in a distinction between media designed for large screens and media designed for small screens. He has made both types of media, and so clearly believes they both have merit, but thinks only the former—films for large screens—should be eligible for an Oscar.
- SilasX 8y agoAh, okay, that's actually pretty reasonable. Or at least not obviously-unreasonable.