3 ms·
It sure shouldn’t be. Can you point to a law (it would have to be an amendment to the Constitution) that codifies this? As far as I know, it’s only practically
by snazz 8y ago
It sure shouldn’t be. Can you point to a law (it would have to be an amendment to the Constitution) that codifies this? As far as I know, it’s only practically a “constitutional exclusion zone”, not legally.
- roywiggins 8y agoThe fourth amendment has been interpreted by SCOTUS in such a way that certain things are "reasonable" near the border that would not be further away from it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Martinez-Fuerte https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Martinez-Fuer... SCOTUS is, for good and ill, the last word on what's Constitutional, until it changes its mind.