3 ms·

This seems like a good idea, but it may land you in even more trouble. If it can be shown that you intentionally misled officers about content on your device, n

by halgir 8y ago

This seems like a good idea, but it may land you in even more trouble. If it can be shown that you intentionally misled officers about content on your device, not merely denied questioning, you risk an obstruction of justice charge.

squarefoot 8y ago
How about enforcing this by contract to shift the responsibility towards the employer, which presumably has more teeth to defend itself from abuses? Say a clause in every IT worker contract stating that when a LEO asks to unlock any device, a predefined user account must be used to log in. In the OP case, I'd hardly believe they'd send SWAT teams to Cupertino to raid Apple offices.
- jacobush 8y ago
  Yay for getting protection from your local Lord or Knight against the King. Sad if it’s come to this.
- voxic11 8y ago
  Contracts, or at least clauses within contracts, which require a party to break the law are not valid.