It does feel like there is an element of cherry picking in the chosen data presentations. It invites believing “injustice” trends while obfuscating what the tru

It does feel like there is an element of cherry picking in the chosen data presentations. It invites believing “injustice” trends while obfuscating what the true multiple-comparisons adjustment for some type of significance or posterior credibility would be. The conclusion that tickets are enforced in a way that manifests injustice is probably broadly true, but the data presentation actually makes it quite hard to interpret what’s “real” and what might just be an artifact of cherry picking, not to mention what slices of the data could be exhibiting something like Simpson’s paradox, etc.