Completely agreed. I find it hard to read anything but the simplest of @ positional examples, and code has to be written to be read. I have been writing Go a l

Completely agreed. I find it hard to read anything but the simplest of @ positional examples, and code has to be written to be read. I have been writing Go a lot more these days and greatly appreciate the simplicity of language. Coming from a Perl background, and the TMTOWTDI (There's More Than One Way To Do It) philosophy, I've seen how that can make for clever but hard to read programs and I'd have preferred Ruby to err in the other direction.