Personally, even though `.then` resembles A+ promise-like syntax -- I find that it feels more idiomatic than `yeild_self`. I remember Matz talking about this at

Personally, even though `.then` resembles A+ promise-like syntax -- I find that it feels more idiomatic than `yeild_self`. I remember Matz talking about this at RubyKaigi, and I wondered how it would work in practice; however, I enjoy that syntax much more than its predecessor. Addressing some of the author's comments, I would agree with: - Endless ranges - The "@" syntax names.each { puts @1 } I would love to see more dialogue on how these changes _could_ positively affect the language. Also, if these are adopted widely, there will be the inevitable Rubocop rule telling you that it prefers this syntax over the "legacy." I love Rubocop, but sometimes I feel there's no end to the journey to writing 'idomatic' ruby and the continued language sprawl definitely does not help on this front.