3 ms·
Possibly, but I would assume it would would be too slow. While big does have assembly implementations, it is designed to handle very large numbers -- ~int128 si
by cyphar 8y ago
Possibly, but I would assume it would would be too slow. While big does have assembly implementations, it is designed to handle very large numbers -- ~int128 sized numbers are probably too small for it to be efficient. I could be wrong though.
- giovannibajo1 8y agoCorrect. It is impossible for a generic signed/unsigned N-bit library to perform as efficiently as a specific uint128 code path.