> relatively linear / easy path to success due to being naturally talented I don't really believe that. > lack the understanding for how to properly lead the

> relatively linear / easy path to success due to being naturally talented I don't really believe that. > lack the understanding for how to properly lead the people in society who don’t integrate as well into these existing systems. Not really about that either. Looking at things the way you do is a very "good grades" point of view. When I was talking about "bad grades" people problems as government problems, I meant like being a beneficiary of a social assistance program like SNAP. The only person Andrew Yang regularly interacts with on SNAP is his kids' nanny. He's never lived that life, never received government assistance, practically no one in "good grades" society has during their adult life. The nanny didn't fail to integrate into "existing systems." She doesn't lack "natural talent." An idea of "good grades" society is systemizing comparisons like that, that one person is better than another at something, whereas government leadership is fundamentally about one person-one vote and preserving the commons.