> It’s that the source being open is a necessary, but not sufficient, component of being open source I would really have preferred if some other term than "ope

> It’s that the source being open is a necessary, but not sufficient, component of being open source I would really have preferred if some other term than "open source" would have been used to refer this wider concept of openess, in this paragraph and the ones that follow. The article itself establishes that open source is all about license, and thus argues it to be insufficient for todays environment.