4 ms·
I think the question they’re asking is already observable. Who is privileged to have finances that can pursue a healthy lifestyle compared to the person having
by bellerose 8y ago
I think the question they’re asking is already observable. Who is privileged to have finances that can pursue a healthy lifestyle compared to the person having to order off the dollar menu. Who can afford supplements, exercising and leisure time without stress. No matter it’s unfair and people have no trouble not caring when they’re the privileged. Nobody’s going to take the fallacious high road with any drug that increases lifespan or lifestyle and give it to the less privileged or unfortunate compared to themselves.
- goldenkey 8y agoPretty much. The common mythology of the fat rich guy is mostly untrue. Its the wealthy that have time to devote to weightlifting and even hiring a personal trainer, eating expensive protein shakes and supplements, possibly even getting TRT from a doctor. Wealth supports health for most folk unless they are slimes like Harvey Weinstein who would rather rape and eat grapes and drink bottles of wine like a heathen.
- acct1771 8y agoThough you don't see the health -> wealth progressions lauded as often, this does not mean they don't exist.
- Nasrudith 8y agoThe best solution is the obvious one - if proven safe and effective mass produce it and make it cheap enough for everyone. Drug production is usually expensive to set up but cheap to run - especially with biosimilars. It is also a hormone too which should mean non-patentable in itself. Any government not bleeding stupid should subsidize it heavily or make it themselves for the economic gains.