5 ms·
I strongly disagree with the blog's author opinion. Before basing your opinion on MeeGo on a biased article, read Arstechnica's article too: ( http://arstechni
by moondowner 16y ago
I strongly disagree with the blog's author opinion.
Before basing your opinion on MeeGo on a biased article, read Arstechnica's article too: ( http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/11/meego-conference-momentum-intact-despite-lack-of-hardware.ars http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/11/meego-confer... )
P.S. "At one point, after a long explanation that failed to answer the question of why MeeGo didn't yet have a framework for developers to sell their apps, a developer from Norway shouted out: "We don't care about openness, we need to be able to make a living.""
What is Qt then? http://qt.nokia.com/products/platform/meego/ http://qt.nokia.com/products/platform/meego/
Come on...
- sdfghjkjhg 16y agoQt is a very nice cross platform gui framework - it's not an app store
- moondowner 16y agoWell an app store isn't a framework either :) The author's sentence then doesn't make sense. Either-ways, my point was MeeGo has a great platform for developing applications, Qt is great, and QtCreator is an excellent IDE.
- sdfghjkjhg 16y agoI think in this context 'framework' means "a way is provided to" not in it's technical sense. The developer was complaining that there was no system in place to sell apps to users - not that there was no gui toolkit to write them.
- blub 16y agoHow can you sell apps for phones that don't exist yet? Ovi store and Intel AppUp will allow sales for MeeGo when the time comes.
- commandar 16y agoThe article used the word "sell," not develop.
- bsergean 16y ago" didn't yet have a framework for developers to sell their apps" - this sentence doesn't make any sense to me, either the author did not read it twice before posting his blog, or he's not a programmer. There is a framework as you stated (the excellent Qt), I don't know about the AppStore thought.