5 ms·
Coming from the view that I agree with almost all the points he's making, I found it an incredibly bad article. Half of it was a long tangent about NPD after w
by ben509 8y ago
Coming from the view that I agree with almost all the points he's making, I found it an incredibly bad article.
Half of it was a long tangent about NPD after which he flatly admits that his readers shouldn't be trying to diagnose NPD... but he's giving you detailed recommendations about how to recognize all the behaviors associated with it and then act on them! This is coming from a clinical psychologist, so that seems wrong.
I agree you want to identify people with that behavioral profile and get them out of your organization (whereupon they'll be Somebody Else's Problem...) but it seems like this psychology could be translated into guidance with less ethical sharp edges than "here's the DSM description of this disorder. But don't actually play psychologist, LOL!"
After that he finally gets to deadlines and kinda sorta gets into why they're bad. And I don't disagree, but the article claims that deadlines are used by emotionally immature managers acting out of "fear." Sometimes, but deadlines are way too commonly used in every sector of industry to attribute them to emotionally immature leaders.
It's off to a vignette about a manager who couldn't recognize his greatness. So after he's spent pages tell us about how narcissistic people behave, this section felt like he was trolling me to think he's a narcissist. (I don't think he's a narcissist, just full of himself; which may well be an accurate self-assessment.)
But the manager's problem wasn't deadlines, it was micro-management which manifests exactly as he describes. In micro-management deadlines are one of a number of symptoms, but the underlying problem is the fear and emotional immaturyity he mentioned earlier.
He finally does get to why deadlines are so common: "They are a form of contract that can enable multiple organizations to synchronize their efforts, organizations that might be in the same company or in different companies."
The need to synchronize between organizations is plainly why deadlines are extremely common.
That's my real criticism of the article: he's a clinical psychologist, a rather irresponsible one, and he's viewing this through that lens. While it's insightful in many ways, deadlines represent a structural problem more than a human problem and the article would be better if it didn't try to solve them. (And, in fairness, most of it doesn't even address them.)
- gerbilly 8y agoI liked the article, but about a third of the way in I thought: "This article needs a good editor" Rule number one of writing is to be willing to cut some good material out because it does not fit your current piece.
- duncanriach 8y agoI'm not only trained as a clinical psychologist. I also have 14+ of experience as a professional engineer and a manager/leader, with an MS in electrical engineering. So I'm viewing this as someone who worked an individual contributor, a technical leader, and as a manager, and then went and trained as a clinical psychologist, and then came back to engineering. I also coach leaders.
- satokema 8y agoThe GP is suggesting that you add "reader, writer, and editor" to your credentials. Not that I give one single care about any of them. The middle section could pretty much describe "anyone management doesn't like that doesn't completely give their life to the company". It equally applies to the sociopath as well as the talented person that isn't excited by your business plan of selling ever-more paperclips.
- duncanriach 8y agoAny knowledge or skillset can be misunderstood and/or misapplied. I'm doing my best to express my understanding, which may, of course, be completely wrong. I've also been doing my best to understand this stuff, which included taking a long break from engineering work to study it.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]