3 ms·
Was the deployment process of your parent post actually error-prone? From what I gathered, the developers were unaware of the lost handheld scanners. I imagine
by sucrose 8y ago
Was the deployment process of your parent post actually error-prone? From what I gathered, the developers were unaware of the lost handheld scanners. I imagine if they did they could've proactively put them out-of-service until found.
- ajuc 8y agoWe had automatic updates in the thin clients (that's how we were able to add "logging to server" on all of them at once). The problem was - the startup menu with testing/production choice was enabled independently of the autoupdate mechanism (separate configuration file ignored by autoupdates) for some technical reason (I think to allow a few people to test new processes while most of the warehouse works on the old version on production database).