3 ms·
I have done that and for some reason the structure of Django seemed more logical and appealing for me, but I had hoped that there were bigger reasons/features/l
by notdarkyet 18y ago
I have done that and for some reason the structure of Django seemed more logical and appealing for me, but I had hoped that there were bigger reasons/features/libs to push me into one direction rather than simply preference.
I will be using a hosting service so the ease of use in implementation is also a big issue, not just the framework itself.
- apgwoz 18y agoI think you'll get more options for hosting with "claimed" support for Rails. Hell, you could even use http://heroku.com/ http://heroku.com/ Personally, I chose django, but only because I was a python programmer before ror and django took off. If I were to do it again, I might look seriously at Pylons, as I consistently read good things about it.
- kashif 18y agoWell both Python and Ruby can be easily hosted without ANY need for specialized hosting. Heroku isnt just a host. Neither is GooglesAppEngine or AWS.
- frankus 18y agoTrue, but this wasn't really the case before mod_rails (Passenger) made it relatively painless to host rails apps on a shared server. I deployed a smallish rails app on Dreamhost in about 5 minutes last night. My previous attempt to deploy on a stock SuSE/apache2 server took a few days of fairly dedicated prodding.