4 ms·
Trying to move, but it's tough. Old codebase, lots of deps, and no real benefit to upgrading to 3.6, nothing our end users will care about or notice (or pay for
by jordigh 8y ago
Trying to move, but it's tough. Old codebase, lots of deps, and no real benefit to upgrading to 3.6, nothing our end users will care about or notice (or pay for).
Upgrading to Python 3 is a chore. We have to do it, but it's not fun and it's barely useful.
- ses4j 8y agoWell said.
- bjt2n3904 8y agoI would argue py3 has negative utility for that reason. Plus, the mess of 3.5 vs 3.6 vs 3.7.
- user5994461 8y agoWhat happened between those?
- misterdoubt 8y agoNothing obviously a "mess." Your guess is as good as mine.
- cpburns2009 8y agoAt worst async became a keyword in 3.5. I have to say I am enjoying f-strings from 3.6.
- PunchTornado 8y agodon't your users in 2020 care you are using an unsupported language? security wise
- user5994461 8y agoOf course not. That's the point.
- PunchTornado 8y agothe users care that your site is secure, especially if you're using their confidential info. can you achieve security with a dead language? I don't think so.
- jordigh 8y agoUsers care very little about security, actually.