> If I understand you correctly, you are advocating for anti-privacy by _forcing_ advertisers into "transparency"? That's absolutely correct. If you donate mor

> If I understand you correctly, you are advocating for anti-privacy by _forcing_ advertisers into "transparency"? That's absolutely correct. If you donate more than a certain sum to campaign, you should be forced to be transparent about it. > That sounds dangerous. How would you feel if we put some campaign spending controls on campaigns you _agree_ with and promote? I live in a country where all political parties are bound by exactly such rules. Moreover TV advertising by political parties are is explicity banned. Instead parties are allocated short 'Party political broadcast' slots on the main channels. It doesn't feel particularly "dangerous". There doesn't need to be a global law.