3 ms·
> And once again, this would be a question that should be studied carefully when people's lives are at risk I agree 100% with this, but how can this question b
by tntn 8y ago
> And once again, this would be a question that should be studied carefully when people's lives are at risk
I agree 100% with this, but how can this question be studied of this research to develop these systems doesn't go forward?
You earlier characterized the FastMRI research as, in your view, "actually very dangerous." As I see it, the research here is potentially extremely valuable, and the danger comes not from the research, but from somebody deciding to deploy it without considering these questions. Typically the road from research program to wide deployment is quite long, and I disagree that we should discourage the research because of potential flaws in the productization process. (Unless there is ill will on the part of the researchers, which I'm assuming there is not).
- dontreact 8y agoI think it’s the lack of will to study these sort of things that is dangerous. There just doesn’t seem to be this sense of caution among the people working on this. They seem to just want to jump over the low bar set by the fda and move ahead to patient care.