6 ms·
I think the point of the article is summed up in the sentence: "The key components of metric fixation are the belief that it is possible – and desirable – to r
by js8 8y ago
I think the point of the article is summed up in the sentence:
"The key components of metric fixation are the belief that it is possible – and desirable – to replace professional judgment (acquired through personal experience and talent) with numerical indicators of comparative performance based upon standardised data (metrics)"
Basically, it is a problem of trust. You're trying to replace trust in people with a metric which, in theory, lets you not to have trust in them.
Personally, I think it is a foolish goal. You are effectively replacing the trust in people (which, admittedly, is vague) with trust in the metric (which connection to reality is vague). The vagueness has a reason - reality is complicated.
Why not just tell people what the "broader strategic objective" is, instead of trying to come up with a metric that is an exact (and so necessarily wrong) description of it?
- philipodonnell 8y agoTrust is the wrong word, its more about alignment. I do trust that employees can exercise their professional judgement. I don't expect that every employee can perfectly align themselves behind a strategic objective without guidance. If my broader strategic objective is to cut costs by 15% allow more competitive pricing, the last thing I want is for every individual to define what that means to them and hope the math works out in the end.
- js8 8y ago"I do trust that employees can exercise their professional judgement. I don't expect that every employee can perfectly align themselves behind a strategic objective without guidance." That's strange to me, because the former surely seems to be much more difficult than the latter.