3 ms·
>Also, it's pretty wild that you are effectively entitled by law to a 25% increase in salary if you have a child under 9. That's incorrect. It's at a reduced s
by cr1895 8y ago
>Also, it's pretty wild that you are effectively entitled by law to a 25% increase in salary if you have a child under 9.
That's incorrect. It's at a reduced salary.
If you're on a permanent contract and if your full-time function isn't in some way demonstrably critical to the business, you're also entitled to work fewer hours if you want, unrelated to children.
- balfirevic 8y ago> That's incorrect. It's at a reduced salary. So I presumed, which is why I responded with disbelief to a commenter that sad (in response to a question whether salary is reduced): > I would hope not. This article suggests that this is not the case