3 ms·
The author doesn't hold copyright on code other people submitted unless they explicitly give ownership via a CLA or similar. A licence would make it clearer, or
by CamouflagedKiwi 8y ago
The author doesn't hold copyright on code other people submitted unless they explicitly give ownership via a CLA or similar. A licence would make it clearer, or at least a lot easier for other people to consume.
- littlestymaar 8y agoExactly, but since it's a learning project it's not obvious it's supposed to receive and accept code contribution anyway (so far it didn't receive any, the only two commits are fixes to typos in the README). That being said, it would be nice from the author to put the code under a permissive license to allow other people to play with his code too (at the moment, even forking it is a copyright infringement…).
- slavik81 8y ago> at the moment, even forking it is a copyright infringement Not that it changes much, but from the GitHub Terms of Service: > By setting your repositories to be viewed publicly, you agree to allow others to view and "fork" your repositories https://help.github.com/en/articles/github-terms-of-service#5-license-grant-to-other-users https://help.github.com/en/articles/github-terms-of-service#...
- littlestymaar 8y agoYes you're right, github forking is allowed. Pulling the code on your computer, changing it and contributing changes on your fork is still illegal though.
- GoblinSlayer 8y agoNot illegal, but rather not granted (and not denied either). Only the author decides, as it's his right, not someone's else.