3 ms·
It is not, you can check the post for the full context.
by dajonker 8y ago
It is not, you can check the post for the full context.
- gadgetoid 8y agoOr, better still, an Archive.org snapshot of the commit that added this very code: https://web.archive.org/web/20190331195338/bitbucket.org/pipdig/p3/commits/edc47824200e15d64cab7270debc4a0526a8d323 https://web.archive.org/web/20190331195338/bitbucket.org/pip... (As a resident geek, I was asked to look into this by a friend)
- aasasd 8y agoFor good measure, the commit seems to be removed from the original repo.
- ivanhoe 8y agoIt's pretty much the same as if it was hardcoded, it drops all tables that have a name starting with the WP prefix. It's extremely ugly, but it's not unsafe (if your plan is removing all WP related tables from the DB).