3 ms·

If that's the case, why do only 28% of working men opt-in for that benefit? Also, it's pretty wild that you are effectively entitled by law to a 25% increase i

• cr1895 8y ago
  >Also, it's pretty wild that you are effectively entitled by law to a 25% increase in salary if you have a child under 9. That's incorrect. It's at a reduced salary. If you're on a permanent contract and if your full-time function isn't in some way demonstrably critical to the business, you're also entitled to work fewer hours if you want, unrelated to children.
  • balfirevic 8y ago
    > That's incorrect. It's at a reduced salary. So I presumed, which is why I responded with disbelief to a commenter that sad (in response to a question whether salary is reduced): > I would hope not. This article suggests that this is not the case