4 ms·
None of that says that the facial recognition system was used to identify the tenants. From what it looks like this happened without any use of the facial recog
by manfredo 8y ago
None of that says that the facial recognition system was used to identify the tenants. From what it looks like this happened without any use of the facial recognition system. It looks like a security guard staring at cameras all day saw something that looked suspicious.
Here's a thought: maybe if facial recognition was used, all of the people in the halls would be recognized as tenants and wouldn't have been bothered by management? Is that supposed to be a bad thing?
- pavel_lishin 8y ago> maybe Why are we bending over so hard to take management's side? This is the management that acted counter to the law and counter to what the security camera was showing: > New York State law, in fact, grants tenants the right to meet peacefully in nearly any location in a building as long as they are not obstructing passageways. Management maintains that tenants were getting in the way even if the pictures did not clearly indicate that.