> but I believe that there is interest in private and public markets to get hands on a stack that starts with a higher security threshold compared with what we

> but I believe that there is interest in private and public markets to get hands on a stack that starts with a higher security threshold compared with what we have now. There's certainly some interest, in some parts of industry. NASA [0] has an FPGA board they made to be more rugged, for CubeSats, which had multiple layers for preventing program corruption. I'd be shocked if it had a backdoor into it, and would expect parts of the system would make it more resistant to tampering. Unfortunately, I also expect that if any chip becomes something popular among consumers, state actors will push their weight and get their weaknesses. [0] https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/1998.html https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experime...