> This is a fallacy. Please do point out where the statement is incorrect. I wasn't talking about perception, people have all kinds of ideas about machines (m

> This is a fallacy. Please do point out where the statement is incorrect. I wasn't talking about perception, people have all kinds of ideas about machines (mostly unfounded), but typically safety records drive policy, not whether drivers think they are better than the machine. I believe machine assisted driving is safer than unassisted already and will continue to improve such that in 10 or 20 years human drivers will be the exception, not the norm. That will happen because computers are already safer in most conditions - the switch will happen when they are demonstrably far safer in all conditions. Remember they don't have to beat the best human driver, just the average.