3 ms·
> I’d say learning how to write those characters is mostly a waste for anyone other than historians You are totally wrong here: this is a useful skill for anyo
by titanix2 8y ago
> I’d say learning how to write those characters is mostly a waste for anyone other than historians
You are totally wrong here: this is a useful skill for anyone living there because, like it or not, this is how people are actually writing their languages. Also have a look at any scientific paper written in Korean and you will see how comical it is: every conceptual word is follow by its writing in Chinese characters in parenthesis because there is so many homophones for all the loan words coming from Chinese that using a phonemic script makes the text un-understandable.
- redthrow 8y agoYou must have misunderstood, when I said "write", I meant handwriting, with stroke order and all. There's no need to learn to write this way, at all, for almost anyone.
- titanix2 8y agoOh I see. But then, handwriting taken appart, stroke order does matter and is a feature for more easy remembering. One actually only have to rote learn 500 characters to get a feeling of the system and then handwriting get optional. Anyway, how would you recommend to learn the characters instead?
- redthrow 8y agoLike Prof Victor Mair says, if someone is a beginner, I don't recommend learning characters at all for the first 2-3 years. (If you are a Japanese learner, learning kana wouldn't hurt, it takes a few weeks at most anyways vs years for kanji - and it's not like you "master" kanji after those years, as any native speaker would be able to demonstrate).
- yorwba 8y ago2-3 years is an awfully long time to spend learning a language without being able to read, though. And if you plan to learn it later anyway, you might as well start with it from the beginning.
- redthrow 8y agoYeah I should've said "I don't recommend learning how to write the characters by hand in the first 2-3 years, or ever". As gibolt said, it's much easier to just learn to recognize characters, without being able to write them by hand. If you learn Japanese for, say, 2 years, even without consciously trying to learn the characters (e.g. by using rikai-chan/kun) when reading articles, you'll encounter the same words over and over so you'll be able to recognize them, even if you can't write them by hand. And that's good enough. Most native Japanese speakers cannot write words like 咀嚼 or 憂鬱 by hand, but many more can pronounce them just fine.
- gibolt 8y agoYou can easily recognize 500 words (~750 characters) within a month. Picking them up after you learn everything else becomes even harder. As a person who learned and teaches it, don't skip the characters.
- titanix2 8y agoPr Mair have his opinion on the matter, I have mine. And while he his famous in his field, given I have formal education in Japanese at the MA level, some self taught Chinese proficiency (mostly reading) and linguistic knowledge (mostly phonology) about both these languages and some of their older varieties, I would not blindly follow his advice that I think is misleading. That doesn't mean Chinese education is perfect right now, and I also think that traditional characters, while seeming more complex can be better for beginners as the system has a more regular internal consistency. And it's easier to learn simplified when knowing traditional than the reverse.
- ListeningPie 8y agoHaving studied Japanese the physical motion of writing out the characters has significantly improved my retention of them. They each have a specific order which makes the radicals and similarities and relationships between different characters clear.
- redthrow 8y agoYeah, I'd recommend actually learning the language (vocab, pronunciation etc), rather than trying to learn the characters and trying to improve the retention of them.