Same for humans too! Not trying to state the obvious but the Fig 31 and 32 in the paper might also make humans believe that there is, or should be a lane - alth

Same for humans too! Not trying to state the obvious but the Fig 31 and 32 in the paper might also make humans believe that there is, or should be a lane - although it looks like an error. The changes on the road are certainly not minor at all! What is critical is to consider further context and its unclear if the interpretation of the image by itself would cause the AV to make an incorrect decision. It's part of a large amount of information that is consumed in the decision-making process I assume - again similar to humans.