3 ms·
The way I have learned to deal with it is switching to a mostly read-only software publishing. The default of my answers to issues is some sort of "No", which m
by franciscop 8y ago
The way I have learned to deal with it is switching to a mostly read-only software publishing. The default of my answers to issues is some sort of "No", which might be "good idea, but not now", "good, but not planned, PR open", "not within the project's objectives", "bad idea, there's a better way", etc.
This is not great, I'd love to be able to do OSS fulltime and help hundreds of people out there. But the reality is that, with a fulltime job, it is either not helping 90+% individuals or risking burning out, which would be even worse (especially for me). Also, the fact that my software is used by millions of people per year (directly and indirectly) and I've received $10 in donations in total (~5 years of OSS) hints me that it's a very non-sustainable market.
- blattimwind 8y ago> I consider this project feature complete. If you want a new feature, you need to bring a compelling reason to convince me and a good patch.
- hartator 8y agoWhat’s your project? I am running a fairly popular Ruby gem. Donations are indeed very low. To the point I have just remove the link.