4 ms·
> it needs less centralization That's a nice sounding platitude. It'd be fucking terrible for privacy and data protection, though.
by cjhopman 8y ago
> it needs less centralization
That's a nice sounding platitude. It'd be fucking terrible for privacy and data protection, though.
- cjhopman 8y agoNot that it doesn't have it's benefits, though. It's just that anytime someone proposes it as a panacea, I feel they must be being either disingenuous or they just completely don't understand what they're talking about.
- ravenstine 8y agoI didn't say complete decentralization, just less centralization than where we are heading. I am not even talking decentralized servers here, just a greater variety of choices with more anonymity. I don't see how that is any less secure than trusting Zuckerberg or Google.