Interesting questions, why is he writing this, and why here? A few guesses: 1) Bezos had made claims in his original post that AMI and the Saudis were in leagu

Interesting questions, why is he writing this, and why here? A few guesses: 1) Bezos had made claims in his original post that AMI and the Saudis were in league on the Bezos attack. That got walked back a little in this post when he admitted that (paraphrasing): it is unclear how much AMI knew, but it was still totally the Saudis. Maybe there won't be any evidence coming to back that up other than the AMI lawyers' strange request. 2) Bezos had given some of the credit for these claims to de Becker before, but now the weight of any truth or not is squarely on GdB. 3) Setting the record straight(?) that Michael Sanchez was not vile but rather a semi-victim of a larger plot might be helpful to Jeff the human in love. Why The Beast? Well as you can now see every news wire picked it up within hours, so maybe they're just conveniently easy to use as the first publishing spot.