5 ms·
> I would love a de-centralized web, but it is pretty hard to go back. As the powers that be continue to centralize and exert control in a negative way, I have
by rannug 8y ago
> I would love a de-centralized web, but it is pretty hard to go back.
As the powers that be continue to centralize and exert control in a negative way, I have a feeling the pendulum will swing the other way once people get annoyed with it.
Kids are already using VPNs to circumvent controls.
Need to make a cyberpunk-esque decentralization kit for the next generation to adopt.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- bo1024 8y agoThat would be really cool! I feel like one of the surprisingly-big barriers is just the difficulty of geting a static IP address assigned to your home. If you could do that, then (I think) they could run everything from a Raspberry Pi: their own website, hosting their own email, etc etc. (It's actually not much harder technically to set this all up on a VPS, but then the kid has to put a monthly fee on a card -- probably a big barrier for parents.) Am I right, or is there an easy way to get around the static IP issue?
- rannug 8y agoI don't have a static IP at home. It changes every few weeks. I have a hack where a cron job uploads my home IP to a cloud server so I can know what it is when the IP changes. Maybe a Distributed Hash Table DNS interface is in order? I think it could work if you cache your peers, and reach out to let them know your current state. Even during the Venezuela blackouts, not all IPs went dark.
- bo1024 8y agoThat would be really cool! The question I see is how to handle resolutions where two people both claim to be example.com. Maybe you could use some cryptography to make sure it's always whoever first claims a domain.
- jlgaddis 8y ago> I have a hack where a cron job uploads my home IP to a cloud server so I can know what it is when the IP changes. I don't have a clue what a "Distributed Hash Table DNS interface" is, but I'll note that a solution [0] to this problem has been around for over two decades. [0]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2136 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2136
- johnny22 8y agoIf you don't have distributed backups handled, then you're just putting most users in a worse situation. Now they can lose important parts of their digital life in one disk crash.
- bo1024 8y agoGreat point, though I'd point out backups don't have to be distributed or cloud-based. I was thinking it would be interesting to have a protocol (probably built on bittorrent) that encrypts your data and backs it up onto other's servers in return for storing some of their encrypted backups on yours.