5 ms·
De Becker claims to have evidence and lawnchair_harry claims there is none (we haven't seen any at least). De Becker has all the reasons to bluff while lawnchai
by fogetti 8y ago
De Becker claims to have evidence and lawnchair_harry claims there is none (we haven't seen any at least). De Becker has all the reasons to bluff while lawnchair_harry has all the reasons to be skeptical. I am not sure why is he downvoted.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- archgoon 8y agoWhat reason does de Becker have to falsely accuse the Saudi Government of hacking Jeff's phone? I don't see any upside for Bezos and de Becker to make themselves enemies of the Saudi Arabian government.
- nindalf 8y agoThere’s no downside. Bezos and the Saudis are already enemies because of the Washington Post’s coverage. What’s this article going to do? Make MBS feel sad?