4 ms·
The 2014 numbers read to me that 25% of all CPU cycles are spent on GC. If you re-read my previous post I was talking about that old version. The point was that
by the8472 8y ago
The 2014 numbers read to me that 25% of all CPU cycles are spent on GC. If you re-read my previous post I was talking about that old version. The point was that Go started improvements from a fairly bad place, were gains are still relatively easy to obtain.
> Of course gains are to be expected when switching from Java's default GC to something specialized.
So? That's irrelevant for what's state of the art.
- hu3 8y agoI re-read our conversation thread to understand our communication mismatch and indeed you were taking about Go's GC not being novel, which it isn't. I apologize for the unproductive conversation, it's all on me.