3 ms·

Let me start with saying that in no way do I think the Saudis are not nefarious or clear of any guilt in this case. However, the original post asked how the di

Let me start with saying that in no way do I think the Saudis are not nefarious or clear of any guilt in this case. However, the original post asked how the digital material was obtained. The post, and many others, imply some technical wizardry was used to obtain said info. Who is to say the Saudis did not employ traditional human intelligence to learn that the brother had access to the ‘dirt’? My point is simply: just because the Saudis knew which stone to turn over does not mean they used some technical prowess to turn over said stone. [edit] clarify my stone turning over analogy.

mikeyouse 8y ago
De Becker (who is as credible as technical investigators get) said that his investigators along with outside experts developed evidence that showed that the Saudis had access to Bezos's phone. He turned this evidence over to Federal investigators. Without knowing more, it's hard to say exactly what happened, but there is plenty of evidence of the Saudis, along with other repressive regimes, spending huge sums of money buying and weaponizing zero-days to target critics. So they had the means, the motive, and the opportunity to target him..
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]