I think the reason you can end up justifying anything you want in ethics is because you're trying to explain something that's undecidable. You need to pit diffe

I think the reason you can end up justifying anything you want in ethics is because you're trying to explain something that's undecidable. You need to pit different interests of people against one another and then find out which one is more important. It's like comparing apples and oranges - you can do it, but the result is going to be colored by the biases you think are important to compare. It's not going to be a fully objective comparison. The real world is a highly complex system. So complex in fact that the basic principles get lost in the noise of everything going on in the world.