2 ms·
Your problem is going to be that you not only need butter but also need a myriad other things and only a few of those can be self sufficient in a small local co
by chx 8y ago
Your problem is going to be that you not only need butter but also need a myriad other things and only a few of those can be self sufficient in a small local community. Yes, we shouldn't truck things from half a country away but that doesn't mean the energy consumption / CO2 footprint at the end of the day will be lower for a sprawl than a dense city.
Yes, cutting back to medieval times, wearing homespun, most amenties supplied by the local blacksmith and cobbler and some things supplied by traveling merchants , that'd obviously be more environmentally friendly. I doubt most people are ready to do that. And also -- Malthus would like to have a word with you. No way you can supply this many people with such technology.
Yes, the ultimate green solution is to decrease the amount of people living on Earth but check how China did with the one child policy.
- Nasrudith 8y agoThe funny thing is that it isn't more friendly because efficiency produces big gains - look at just how much more land is required for organic farming vs conventional practices - let alone lower tech subsistence farming which amounts to 'slash and burn and then move on when the soil has depleted', heck even cooking fires produce far worse air pollution than propane stoves. Local and small scale may 'feel cozy' but they aren't efficient - they were abandoned for a reason.