3 ms·
Really? I got 2 classes on QM. I got no enlightenment, and it mostly made me feel that we had reached the limits of what one can reasonably attempt with pen-and
by ced 19y ago
Really? I got 2 classes on QM. I got no enlightenment, and it mostly made me feel that we had reached the limits of what one can reasonably attempt with pen-and-paper mathematics. Seriously, how many "corrections" do they need to make in order to get a "good enough" hydrogen atom? Not to mention all of the dubious math.
Learning the basics was interesting. The postulates, and all. But that was what, 5 classes? I strongly discourage anyone from going any further. Not worth it. Go study algebra instead, at least, no leap-of-faith approximations are involved.
- byrneseyeview 19y ago(It was a joking paraphrase of ESR's attitude towards Lisp. I don't know enough QM to evaluate it)
- ced 19y agoEh, I had spotted the reference, but thought you were serious. QM was the dark ages of my uni years, so I'm more suceptible to it than I should be, I guess :)
- mojuba 19y agoQM is about finding concise, mathematically perfect but weird solutions to some problems in physics. So is Lisp :)