3 ms·
I mean controversial on the world stage. And I would be happy with it being debated, pity the opposition is too busy trying to scuttle the government to actuall
by hartror 16y ago
I mean controversial on the world stage. And I would be happy with it being debated, pity the opposition is too busy trying to scuttle the government to actually provide a cohesive argument and analysis.
- jacques_chester 16y ago> I mean controversial on the world stage. Why would it be controversial on the world stage? It largely only affects us, it's too small an amount to place our government bonds under serious pressure and Australia's economy is only 1/50th of the world economy. While it is very important for Australians to debate the issue, I don't see why anyone else would need to care. To be honest, arguments about port development in the Pilbara region are far more important to the world economy than FTTH.
- hartror 16y agoGah! > It isn't controversial so it doesn't hit the front page of American centric sites/blogs/media. This is the context in which I said it was not controversial to which you said it was. I never said it WAS controversial on the world stage, in fact that was my original point.
- jacques_chester 16y agoSorry, I misread your post.