Copyright license only covers copying the software or source code. This seems like a "terms of use" that they tried to shove into a copyright license which I d

Copyright license only covers copying the software or source code. This seems like a "terms of use" that they tried to shove into a copyright license which I don't think would hold up in court. This license would cover the package distribution site/provider/github, not the person/entity using the package. The entity/person using software would only trigger the copyright license if they distributed the package(eg: putting the package into a mobile app or selling the software).