3 ms·
Your whole argument is a logical fallacy. You're basically saying "It was bad before, so continuing on the same level isn't making it worse". I haven't checked
by hannob 8y ago
Your whole argument is a logical fallacy.
You're basically saying "It was bad before, so continuing on the same level isn't making it worse". I haven't checked the numbers, but even if true that's not an argument at all.
- gameswithgo 8y agono, his argument is not that simple. read it more closely, he is saying the methane from cows is not causing any methane accumulation. its a fixed, relatively small forcing admidst a monotonically increasing one from co2. If we all stopped eating cows co2 would replace the cow-methane forcing in a short time.