3 ms·
What is most interesting to me is that someone already did a similar research in the English Wikipedia talk page for that file [1], but concluded that it was in
by lifthrasiir 8y ago
What is most interesting to me is that someone already did a similar research in the English Wikipedia talk page for that file [1], but concluded that it was indeed Minard's (oops) and the error still persists today. It is really understandable as the presented differences are minor and only discernible for the most determined people though.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Minard.png https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Minard.png (note that it is actually a Commons image, so there are two talk pages for the same file)
- charliepark 8y agoWelp. I have no recollection of what research I did to conclude that it was “legit”, but I believe that was my post on Wikipedia. As I don’t have memory or note of that research, I can’t really stand behind either my initial claim or my counterclaim.