3 ms·
Makes sense. It didn't come across that way since you mentioned the energy savings and then immediately mentioned those alternatives. Interestingly though, whil
by raz32dust 8y ago
Makes sense. It didn't come across that way since you mentioned the energy savings and then immediately mentioned those alternatives. Interestingly though, while Java used a lot of memory, the energy expenditure for DRAM is still one of the lowest for Java. And they found little correlation between memory usage and DRAM energy in general. I wonder why that is.
- abalone 8y agoYeah they only looked at peak memory. They noted it would be more useful to look at continuous memory usage in future research. Also take note that the scale of the graphs is different. E.g. Figures 5 & 6 makes it look like Java energy is super low when it's really just similar to the compiled languages.[1] [1] http://greenlab.di.uminho.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/sleFinal.pdf http://greenlab.di.uminho.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/sleF...