Sure, go read the document. The title of this doc says "Samsung Relative Evaluation Report on S1, iPhone." I'm guessing that you never worked in technology or

Sure, go read the document. The title of this doc says "Samsung Relative Evaluation Report on S1, iPhone." I'm guessing that you never worked in technology or product engineering team? Again, this internal doc was presented in the trade dress part of the lawsuit -- which Apple eventually lost. Both parties initially agreed not to present anything too confusing to jury because there were so many confusing overlaps between the design and trade dress parts of the lawsuit. Apple suddenly changed its mind at the last minute -- and the judges duly embraced Apple's evidence, but rejected Samsung's counter-evidence on procedural ground (untimeliness). A lot of Apple fanbois like yourself are just still confused about the trade dress and design parts of the lawsuit -- I could only imagine the confusion the internal doc had on the jury, but obviously in Apple's favor since Samsung's never saw the light.