> You wouldn't say that a drunk who walked into a nice restaurant yelling hateful things was being censored when they are asked to leave. This seems like a bad

> You wouldn't say that a drunk who walked into a nice restaurant yelling hateful things was being censored when they are asked to leave. This seems like a bad analogy to me. No loud drunks are forcing anyone to listen to them on YouTube. Yet some people are angry that YouTube lets loud drunks post videos of themselves yelling hateful things, and angry that YouTube lets some people who want to listen that do so?