3 ms·
$400/month for 200K visits? The pricing seems to be based on how much they'll contribute to your bottom line rather than what the market will bear, what competi
by mmaunder 16y ago
$400/month for 200K visits? The pricing seems to be based on how much they'll contribute to your bottom line rather than what the market will bear, what competitors are charging, whether they should focus on growth rather than early profit, etc. This might be a great opportunity for someone to clone the business and charge 25% of their prices, which will still be $250/month for 1 million visits.
- patio11 16y agoYou think the opportunity to be the cheap, crappy competitor with an audience of technically inclined poor people is attractive? I think that is terrible positioning. If you charged $50, that would still be a whole lot of ramen, and you'd lose your customers to the first still cheaper, still crappier alternative or to free options. (There exist compelling free options for A/B testing if one is technically inclined.) $400 is not a lot of money when you probably demonstrate increases in revenue. (It is a fraction of BCCs gains from A/B testing. Nationwide political campaigns, Fortune 500 companies, and real estate firms all have slightly more money to spend than BCC does.)