3 ms·
So, you're saying that the fact they rephrased the headline means that they aren't fit? Or is it that they might be more reasonable than defenders of the headl
by Semiapies 16y ago
So, you're saying that the fact they rephrased the headline means that they aren't fit?
Or is it that they might be more reasonable than defenders of the headline engaging in silly chest-pounding about "sensitive" people?
- reason 16y agoNot much to say really; I've got work to get to. I'm sure there are plenty of others in this thread who are more than willing to discuss the supposed intentions behind this implicitly sexist job posting that has seemed to generate so much nonsensical noise to where the posters themselves changed it, giving the children the pacifier they so desperately wanted. Edit: children, and men, and women.
- Semiapies 16y agoYou're too busy to say anything, so instead 70 words to try to tout your supposed superiority over the people you disagree with.