4 ms·
Somebody should have tested that in Firefox. I don't know what's wrong with it, but it's an unreadable mess.
by r_smart 8y ago
Somebody should have tested that in Firefox. I don't know what's wrong with it, but it's an unreadable mess.
- abc_lisper 8y agoIt looks fine in mine and Im using the latest version.
- tomphoolery 8y agoIt has to do with how wide your screen is. The responsiveness of this piss-poor design was clearly not thought out. But neither was anything else in this design, apparently. There's a 300px square in the middle of the screen that the _entire_ article is contained in. Everything else is just bullshit "interactive" chrome that's totally useless. Sorry NYT, you're not worth the money you're constantly begging for. I love ad blocking.
- maceurt 8y agoCtrl+Shift+r