4 ms·
The F-35 isn't a dogfighter in the WW2 mold of the P-51 Mustang, etc. The F-35 was conceived of for a different kind of fight, more like a contest of swarms th
by smhinsey 8y ago
The F-35 isn't a dogfighter in the WW2 mold of the P-51 Mustang, etc.
The F-35 was conceived of for a different kind of fight, more like a contest of swarms than a series of related but independent jousts. The F-35 is formidable because it works better in a pack than anything else out there. For example, it can fly out ahead of a mass of 4th generation fighters into an environment they couldn't survive and remain there, low-observable, long enough to feed targeting data back to the swarm who can launch a salvo of missiles from over the horizon, out of harm's way. As the article explains, stealth isn't about remaining 100% invisible, which is impossible, rather it's about preventing anyone from shooting while you get the first shot off instead.
Whether or not the F-35 lives up to this hope is another thing, but it was never conceived of as primarily a dominant dogfighter so it's fun but maybe not hugely relevant to stack it up against planes that were designed to win that fight. The F-35 seeks to win it before it even starts, instead. It remains to be seen if anything was learned from the F-4's introduction and if all of this works against peer states, but this is the idea behind it.
- stcredzero 8y agoThe F-35 isn't a dogfighter in the WW2 mold of the P-51 Mustang, etc. Actually, a lot of the WWII fighters used their advantages in flight ceiling, armor, and speed, instead of getting into turning fights. (Though the later allied fighters could also turn.) The Japanese even made a fighter that deliberately sacrificed turning for speed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakajima_Ki-44 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakajima_Ki-44