4 ms·
Why muddy the waters by comparing apples (airplanes) to oranges (cars)? The loss rate of other aircraft models is what's relevant.
by Hinrik 8y ago
Why muddy the waters by comparing apples (airplanes) to oranges (cars)? The loss rate of other aircraft models is what's relevant.
- LoSboccacc 8y agoliterally the comment before: > it would still be more dangerous to drive to the airport than it would be to fly on a 737 Max context is relevant in a discussion.
- RandomBacon 8y agoI don't think it's the loss rate of 737 Max vs other models that is what's relevant either. I said safety of driving to an airport vs flying in a 737 Max. We have to get total number of passenger hours/miles for both methods of transportation and compare those with deaths. I'm not sure if those numbers specifically for the 737 Max are available.