3 ms·
"If anything, they should have designed it such that it follows an IP style system where you get more precise/specific with each period..." I think it is inter
by mdonahoe 8y ago
"If anything, they should have designed it such that it follows an IP style system where you get more precise/specific with each period..."
I think it is interesting that you say that, because I see this system as DNS system on top of IP.
So latlong is your IP, and W3W is your human-readable domain name.
Which begs the question: would a better system involve letting people pay to register names that point to latlongs? There is a free tier that are an open-source list of names for the entire globe, but companies could pay to have names like "free.tacos.here" point to their locations.
- mirimir 8y ago> So latlong is your IP, and W3W is your human-readable domain name. No, it's not. It's actually more like the opposite. The domain name system is hierarchical, and W3W is clearly (and I gather, intentionally) not. IP addresses are also hierarchical, but the mapping of domain names to them is only somewhat systematic. Really, though, W3W identifiers are most like Tor onion names. Just hashes. Indeed, some have suggested replacing alphanumeric onion names with something like W3W.
- alexbecker 8y agoFor most users, the domain name system is only very nominally hierarchical--every domain name they see is of this form: (www.)?[random-words].com
- mirimir 8y agoReally? My wife is ~70, and not all that technical, but she knows (for example) that "maps.google.com" is a Google URL. And she even knows that "mail.google.com.assholes.io" is not a Google URL. It's just anecdotal, I know. But I find it hard to imagine that most people don't understand URL hierarchies. I mean, people who use computers commonly organize files in folders. But maybe that's becoming a lost art, as most new users just have mobile devices.